Jesse Jackson said <i>what</i>?

I must have missed this the first time around, because it happened over three weeks ago:

The Rev. Jesse Jackson said yesterday that the United Nations should consider sanctioning the United States for its decision to ``murder all these people on faulty information'' by waging war in Iraq.

Speaking in Boston on the eve of the anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination, Jackson said the word ``murder'' was appropriate - if inflammatory.

``When you kill people outside of international law, I'm not sure what you should call it,'' the civil rights leader said.

Jackson later called the U.S. invasion of Iraq ``a crime against humanity.''

``Iraqis are human beings, too. We killed them, . . . we executed people on this flawed policy,'' he said...

A U.N. investigation into the Iraq war is warranted, he said, because the United States is acting as ``our own referee, judge and jury in this action.''

``I'm not sure the U.N. has the power to act against us in a miltary way, but they have a right to make a moral judgment,'' he said. ``There should at least be a hearing and a judgment.''

About a year ago, a "peace" group was trying to get the U.N. to do what Jackson wants, using force as necessary. See the links in this post, specifically the one to the article 'Could U.N. use military force on U.S.?':

Could the U.N. use military force to prevent the United States and Britain from waging war on Iraq without a Security Council mandate?

Some anti-war groups are urging the world body to invoke a little-known convention that allows the General Assembly to step in when the Security Council is at an impasse in the face of a "threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of aggression."

The willingness by the U.S. and Britain to go to war with Iraq without Security Council authorization is the kind of threat the U.N. had in mind when it passed Resolution 377 in 1950, said Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, a human-rights group in New York City.

In a position paper, Ratner wrote that by invoking the resolution, called "Uniting for Peace," the "General Assembly can meet within 24 hours to consider such a matter, and can recommend collective measures to U.N. members including the use of armed forces to 'maintain or restore international peace and security.'"...