October 29, 2006

Anti-North American Union resolution introduced

Republican Reps. Virgil Goode Jr. (VA), Tom Tancredo (CO), Walter Jones (NC), and Ron Paul (TX) have introduced a resolution (487):

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada...

...Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That--

(1) the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System;

(2) the United States should not enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada; and

(3) the President should indicate strong opposition to these or any other proposals that threaten the sovereignty of the United States.

Jerome Corsi is working with Howard Phillips (Conservative Caucus Chairman) and Phyllis Schlafly as part of a coalition that wants a Congressional investigation of the NAU. Says Corsi:

"We'd like to see both the House and the Senate in the 110th Congress conduct a serious investigation and get full disclosure from SPP of all documents... If the Bush administration wants to continue to deny that we're on the same track that Europe went on to create the European Union and the euro, then there should be no harm in full disclosure... [otherwise] I'm charging they are secretly on the path to create a North American Union, a new currency – the amero – along the same stealth path that was used in Europe, keeping everything below the radar, by administrative decree, making it to late to stop before the American people finally realize what's gong on."

Posted to NAU at October 29, 2006 10:25 PM

Comments

This definitely should be investigated.
Something which is sure to be unpopular, and extremely so, with probably over 90% of the electorate, must be removed from the secrecy which guilt covers it over with.

Posted by: John S Bolton at October 30, 2006 01:22 AM

It needs to be pointed also the gross contradiction involved in making an ideal out of openness through an EU type development, while relying on administrative secrecy to put over the openness-enhancement.

Posted by: John S Bolton at October 30, 2006 01:39 AM

I quite agree with the Rep. Ron Paul, as dilution leads to pollution, and ultimately to elimination of what we all hold dear: Our lives, liberty, and property.

We, as individuals, would never consider combining our bodies with that of another's, for such a thing would eliminate our uniqueness: We would lose our identity.

Such a thing would make all of us subject to the most perverse, and vile of human machinations, for without an identity we would be easily manipulated by those whose intents are predicated upon the subjugation of others – or even ourselves.

If we cannot identify ourselves within the realm of all of humanity, then we will have no place, and with no place we are merely tokens, to be 'spent' by those inclinded to make us slaves.

Posted by: Highlander at November 5, 2006 06:29 PM