April 20, 2005

Arnold gives far-lefties the faints

LAT:
SAN FRANCISCO - Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Tuesday urged that the U.S. "close the borders" to combat illegal immigration, though an aide quickly clarified his comment, explaining that the governor merely wants the borders better policed.

Schwarzenegger, taking questions at the Newspaper Assn. of America convention, described border security as a "lax situation" and urged tougher measures...
The LAT ends with the relatively measured thoughts of CA state Sen. Gil Cedillo. Gil "one bill gil" Cedillo is the sponsor of innumerable bills to give driver's licenses to illegal aliens. Posts about him start in "Actors, writers and musicians want you to pay all the costs for their cheap labor". In addition to stating that we should give driver's licenses to illegal aliens because "they were here first," here's another one of his quotes:
"Latinos have displaced other work communities - clothing, hotel, and restaurant industries that used to be done by blacks and anglos... Since Latinos are now central to union revitalization, through immigration and high birth rates unions can be partisan for full Latino empowerment."
Carla Marinucci of the San Francisco Chronical reports:
Democrats were quick to react to the governor's statement with outrage. Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez issued a statement saying Schwarzenegger should "ratchet down this rhetoric and retreat from this narrow-minded approach to immigration."

Nunez argued that the idea reflects the approach of "political extremists, not rational policy-makers,'" and said that "even President Bush rejects the idea of a closed border with Mexico."
You can read up on Nunez here and here. Tell me who's the extremist.

The Chronical also includes outraged quotes from the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights.



Posted to Immigration2005a at April 20, 2005 01:05 AM

Comments

"Democrats"

Actually, the one quoted is named Fabian Nunez, so could it be his sensitivity about this is perhaps more related to his ethnicity than his party affiliation? And if so, why wasn't this highlighted in the (several) articles I saw about it, rather than his party status?

Just wondering.

Posted by: eh at April 21, 2005 02:40 AM

If the administration's corrupt appeasement of Mexican demands for lebensraum is so clever politically, why can't they get Schwarzenegger to fall into line with their approach?

Posted by: John S Bolton at April 21, 2005 09:21 AM

No doubt Bush and Fox aim replicate the Mexican socio-political system in the US because it works so well- for people like them.

Posted by: mr civil rights at April 21, 2005 12:11 PM


Non-"liberal" coverage of immigration, Iraq, terrorism, multiculturalism, Los Angeles, California, privacy, and occasionally celebrities and wacky humor...




« Yale senior opposes Lou Dobbs «

» Be patient, my super wealthy friends, our time will come! »






Main

Atom feed · RSS 2.0 feed · RSS 0.91 feed · WML

Subscribe with Bloglines
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN

Search

Support this site

Amazon Honor SystemClick Here to PayLearn More

Categories

Immigration 2008a · Immigration 2007b · Immigration 2007a · Immigration · Immigration (6/05 to 12/05) · Immigration (1/05 to 6/05) · Immigration (8/04 to 12/04) · Immigration (before 8/04) · Immigration & Terrorism · Immigration & Driver's Licenses · Immigration & Consuls · Immigration & Media Bias · Immigration & Europe · North American Union

Blogging Across America

MultiCulti Madness · General Politics · Privacy · Miscellaneous · The "Peace" Movement

Los Angeles · California · Outdoors and sports · Celebrities · Wackiness · Inside Blogging

Iraq · Beltway Sniper · Terrorism & Extremism · The Saudis · Warblogging · War On Drugs

Archives

All Posts(links to each post by title)


Recent Entries
Powered by
Movable Type 3.15